The Plastic Hippo

February 5, 2013

Fair enough

Filed under: Environment,Politics,Transport,Walsall — theplastichippo @ 10:36 pm

Walsall culture
Councillor Anthony Harris, portfolio holder for Leisure and Culture at Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council and Conservative member for Aldridge North and Walsall Wood, is not very keen on criticism. Brace yourself Tony.

In the midst of the annual farce of council budget setting, Walsall cabinet, including public servant Harris, awarded themselves a considerable increase in their allowances. We all know that savings, efficiencies, working smarter, rationalisation or cuts as they are known to people connected with the real universe are inevitable under inept local and national government. Councillor Harris, along with his cabinet colleagues, is a fine upstanding local representative of the community he serves and does a marvellous job defending the interests of his constituents. Any other reward for this selfless democratic duty is, of course, simply a bonus that is rightly deserved.

In a rather bizarre letter emailed to a constituent who had the temerity to speak out against savage cuts to vital services, Anthony went on the offensive. The invaluable Brownhills Bob has brought to our attention the rather disturbing communication sent to a founding member of the Save Walsall`s Green Spaces and Countryside group, the remarkable Linda Mason. In the letter, Councillor Harris claims that he is: “a strong supporter of community involvement and I applaud any group working to improve our greenspaces and countryside – as your campaign group claims to do.” Clearly with an ear to the ground and a finger on the pulse, it is comforting to know that the noble councillor realises that the word “claims” has connotations beyond the entitlement to cabinet allowances. The brightest and the best that Walsall can offer continues: “However if you are going to continue to criticise the council publicly I think we are entitled to know on what basis these criticisms are made.” Obviously the councillor is working so hard for his constituents and the people of Walsall that he has not had enough time to read the evidence that forms the basis for criticism.

The honourable, worth his weight gold representative of the people is quite right to say that it is unacceptable for any member of the public to talk to the press about anything other than what a brilliant job Walsall cabinet are doing and in future any evidence or criticism should be presented to the council press office for approval and burial. Furthermore, it is totally irresponsible for Brownhills Bob to publish private correspondence that in an open democracy should remain secret in order to protect the public from false, unfounded and malicious suggestions that Councillor Harris is something other than a local hero and a treasured genius.

It is utterly superfluous and completely unnecessary to list the astonishing achievements of Councillor Harris or highlight the sacrifice and service he has given to the borough. However, if people continue to criticise then we are entitled to know the nature of his impeccable record. As cabinet member for transport, he delivered the wonderful ring road project only a tiny little bit late and a tiny little bit over budget. Such is his modesty; he expects no thanks from a grateful populous for the success of the traffic calming measure and refuses to boast over the amount of settlement clawed back from tardy contractors. Keeping to his own punishing work schedule he was still able to deliver erudite and witty responses to stupid questions at full council meetings. At one such meeting answering transport questions, it became clear to the adoring public in the gallery that his untiring devotion to civic duty had left him exhausted. The unsteady stance, the slight slurring of speech and difficulty with focusing on the document he was reading from was proof positive that all his energy was being expended on the common good of the borough.

After the triumph of transport, his colossal intellect and boundless energy took on the Leisure and Culture portfolio where he remains to this day performing hourly miracles. He achieved greatness with his masterly handling of the thorny issue of wasteful public libraries and emerged triumphant and stronger than ever. As the arbiter of good taste in Walsall, he continues to champion the most spectacular of cultural experiences available to a sophisticated public and brings us the very best in Monster Truck demonstrations and professional wrestling bouts. His track record in cabinet is exemplary and poor attendance at cabinet meetings is evidence of him unselfishly not taking part in the running of his business. Every responsible councillor must register disclosable pecuniary and other interests under the Localism Act 2011 Section 30 (3) and the Pecuniary Interests Regulation 2012. On his declaration form, Councillor Harris describes his employment as “Funfair and Event Organiser”. Later, when asked for a: “Description of any contract which is made between the relevant person (or a body in which the relevant person has a beneficial interest) and the relevant authority (a) under which goods or services are to be provided or works to be executed; and (b) which has not been fully discharged” Councillor Harris has written “None”. Later still, after crossing out the word “None”, he enters the business address of Pat Collins Funfair and helpfully adds in his own hand: “Whilst in the WBC. I have no financial interest. Of which I have declared an interest. And take no part in running the business.” It is good to know then that every time his funfair is plonked onto the Arboretum Extension, no money has changed hands and all the rides are free.

Councillor Harris might not like criticism but he might like to consider these words: “Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.”

You have to admit, that there Winston Churchill had a way with words.

Advertisements

8 Comments »

  1. What constitutes vital services?
    There’s a genuine need to have refuse collected, transport infrastructure maintained, protection of the vulnerable.
    Guided tours of local duck-ponds don’t really have the same gravitas for the majority of taxpayers I’d suggest.
    If councils everywhere just stuck with providing services that were vital we could all probably afford that and most wouldn’t mind paying for them.
    It wasn’t so long ago that local authorities were able to provide public transport, drainage and water supply, in addition to other statutory requirements, all without CEO’s, cabinet members, and even expenses.
    My, how they’ve progressed.
    Just as an aside, have there ever been reductions in public-spending that weren’t “savage”?

    Comment by Rob — February 5, 2013 @ 11:49 pm | Reply

  2. I do recall Mr Harris speaking on the subject of closing Bryntysilio Outward Pursuits Centre. In June 2010, he said “Sadly, we have not been able to attract new schools to make use of Bryntysilio. It’s past its sell-by date. Frankly, we can’t afford to keep it open.”

    Funny, since the council pulled the plug on finances, Bryntysilio was taken on by a charity which has secured its future for another 12 years. Perhaps Mr Harris could learn a thing or two from somebody who knows how to run a leisure facility.

    He also added that day about the closure of Brynty and Willenhall Leisure Centre that, “We’re in a difficult financial position and tough decisions have to be made.”

    Hmmm … As tough a descision as it was to award yourself and fellow elected members of council a nice little pay rise while cuts are made everywhere else?

    Comment by Antony N Britt — February 6, 2013 @ 12:12 am | Reply

  3. […] in Walsall could more eloquently illuminate the situation than our very own Plastic Hippo. In a cracking piece, the sagacious commentator has pointed up some home truths and laid out pretty […]

    Pingback by If that’s the way it’s going to be… | BrownhillsBob's Brownhills Blog — February 6, 2013 @ 3:01 pm | Reply

  4. well they have to make cuts to give themselves a raise 😉

    I`m just waiting to hear what they haven’t told us…….. the reason to move the proposed Oak Park Leisure Centre and take up more green open space?

    Comment by tkevcro — February 6, 2013 @ 3:45 pm | Reply

    • both Oak Park and Blocco redevlopments are currently nothing more than pie in the sky, possibly to distract from the utter balls-up they’ve made of the budget or from cuts elsewhere.
      The developments can only go ahead IF sport and leisure gets Trust status but there aren’t any published plans or consultations that I can find anywhere to support this.
      I am, however, perfectly willing to accept that the consultation has actually taken place and the only responding peregrine falcon they asked thought it was a good idea, so they’re going ahead on the basis that if enough people get used to the idea then Sport England won’t dare turn down the funding request when it eventually gets sent (unless they send it via the same means they used when they turned down permission for the Pheasey phone mast).

      Comment by martin — February 22, 2013 @ 3:37 pm | Reply

  5. Of course, it would be unhelpful in the extreme to point out that the original Walsall Show, with music, pet shows, fruit & veg displays and all manner of free fun and games, was axed by the council as a cost cutting exercise.
    The name, ‘Walsall Show’ , could be argued to be council property and the tacky, paid-for event which now shames the name should probably pay royalties or a franchise fee.
    However I doubt the portfolio holder has the energy to pursue this.

    Comment by martin — February 11, 2013 @ 2:40 pm | Reply

  6. This is absolutely typical of Walsall Council. I total agree with Anthonys comments as well. If the charity were able to make a success of it and actually drive the project forward, how on earth couldn’t the council.

    Comment by Walsall Resident — February 14, 2013 @ 2:38 am | Reply

  7. To be fair, anyone who is involved in Council affairs will confirm that it is a matter for the individual to decide whether they have an interest. In my experience, Members are reluctant to get on the helter-skelter of challenged undeclared interests

    They can always approach Council Officers for advice. This is generally given in a roundabout way, but Councillors are inevitably tempted to dodgem. If there are fair grounds, there is no reason for Cllr Harris to fight shy of his interests and not duck them.

    Having spent some time on research, I can find nothing to suggest that he has broken any crockery here. Its mostly floss and candy.Were lists terse, I would be worried.

    As things stand, I would suggest that it is all so much popcorn and Tweddle.

    The Realist

    Comment by The Realist — February 18, 2013 @ 12:35 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: